mirror of
https://github.com/domainaware/parsedmarc.git
synced 2026-07-28 11:24:55 +00:00
Sean WhalenandClaude Fable 5
c8e8cb54c0
The alignment flags and normalized_timespan were stored as
string_value "true"/"false" in additional.fields, which diverged from
the [gsecops] API output (a protobuf Struct, where they are real
booleans) — a UDM search written for one delivery path would not match
the other for those four fields.
Google's parser extension examples document the boolean idiom this
uses: build a string, convert to boolean, rename into the boolean
field. It is the boolean analogue of the number_value chain already
used for count/source_asn (proven in the content-hub Azure Cosmos DB
parser), and the UDM search docs confirm additional fields are
matchable via value.bool_value. The string conversion in step 1b
remains, because CBN conditionals compare against the preserved JSON
type and the == "true"/"false" guards need strings.
With this, both delivery paths emit identical value types for every
additional.fields key. The prior justification ("content-hub never
uses bool_value") described the absence of precedent, not a
prohibition; the documented boolean example is the stronger authority.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
parsedmarc
parsedmarc is a Python module and CLI utility for parsing DMARC
reports. When used with Elasticsearch and Kibana (or Splunk), it works
as a self-hosted open-source alternative to commercial DMARC report
processing services such as Agari Brand Protection, Dmarcian, OnDMARC,
ProofPoint Email Fraud Defense, and Valimail.
Note
Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) is an email authentication protocol.
Sponsors
This project is maintained by one developer. Please consider sponsoring my work if you or your organization benefit from it.
Features
- Parses aggregate/rua DMARC reports: the legacy draft and 1.0 schemas (RFC 7489) and the new RFC 9990 schema for the final DMARC standard (RFC 9989)
- Parses failure/ruf DMARC reports (RFC 6591 and RFC 9991; formerly called forensic reports)
- Parses reports from SMTP TLS Reporting (TLS-RPT, RFC 8460)
- Can parse reports from an inbox over IMAP, Microsoft Graph, or Gmail API
- Transparently handles gzip or zip compressed reports
- Consistent data structures
- Simple JSON and/or CSV output
- Optionally email the results
- Optionally send the results to Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or PostgreSQL, for use with premade dashboards
- Optionally send the results to Apache Kafka, Amazon S3, Azure Log Analytics (Microsoft Sentinel), a Graylog (GELF) endpoint, a syslog server, or an HTTP webhook
Python Compatibility
This project supports the following Python versions, which are either actively maintained or are the default versions for RHEL or Debian.
| Version | Supported | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| < 3.6 | ❌ | End of Life (EOL) |
| 3.6 | ❌ | Used in RHEL 8, but not supported by project dependencies |
| 3.7 | ❌ | End of Life (EOL) |
| 3.8 | ❌ | End of Life (EOL) |
| 3.9 | ❌ | Used in Debian 11 and RHEL 9, but not supported by project dependencies |
| 3.10 | ✅ | Actively maintained |
| 3.11 | ✅ | Actively maintained; supported until June 2028 (Debian 12) |
| 3.12 | ✅ | Actively maintained; supported until May 2035 (RHEL 10) |
| 3.13 | ✅ | Actively maintained; supported until June 2030 (Debian 13) |
| 3.14 | ✅ | Supported (requires imapclient>=3.1.0) |