test: add tag-descendant partial-permission coverage, verify pre-migration characterization

Adds TestBulkEditObjectsTagDescendantPartialPermission, exercising the
tag-descendant-expansion block in BulkEditObjectsView.post as a
non-superuser with object-level change_tag granted on a parent tag and
one of two children but not the other, confirming the expansion only
pulls in descendants the requester actually has permission on.

Verified both this test and the existing apply_to_all boundary test
pass unchanged against the pre-migration
get_objects_for_user_owner_aware/has_perms_owner_aware code (reverted
via a scratch patch of the prior commit's views.py hunk, then
restored), confirming they characterize genuine pre-existing behavior
rather than something the permitted_object_ids migration made
necessary.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UmMBGW9FKyDgmKRJ5H9rif

src/documents/tests/test_permission_filtering_security.py

@@ -620,3 +620,117 @@ class TestMatchingRespectsObjectPermissions:
         matched_ids = {sp.pk for sp in matched}
         assert visible_storage_path.pk in matched_ids
         assert hidden_storage_path.pk not in matched_ids
+
+
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+class TestBulkEditObjectsApplyToAllPermissionBoundary:
+    def test_apply_to_all_tags_excludes_unpermitted_tag(self, rest_api_client):
+        owner = User.objects.create_user(username="tags_owner")
+        requester = User.objects.create_user(username="tags_requester")
+        # grant the global change_tag permission so the object-level
+        # filtering (not the global has_perm check) is what's under test
+        requester.user_permissions.add(
+            Permission.objects.get(codename="change_tag"),
+        )
+        rest_api_client.force_authenticate(user=requester)
+        visible = TagFactory(owner=owner)
+        hidden = TagFactory(owner=owner)
+        assign_perm("view_tag", requester, visible)
+        assign_perm("change_tag", requester, visible)
+
+        response = rest_api_client.post(
+            "/api/bulk_edit_objects/",
+            {
+                "object_type": "tags",
+                "operation": "set_permissions",
+                "all": True,
+                "filters": {},
+                "owner": requester.pk,
+            },
+            format="json",
+        )
+        assert response.status_code == HTTPStatus.OK
+
+        # The apply_to_all dispatch must resolve permitted objects up front:
+        # the visible tag (object-level change_tag granted) gets its owner
+        # reassigned, while the hidden tag (no object-level grant) is
+        # excluded entirely and keeps its original owner.
+        visible.refresh_from_db()
+        hidden.refresh_from_db()
+        assert visible.owner == requester
+        assert hidden.owner == owner
+
+
+@pytest.mark.django_db
+class TestBulkEditObjectsTagDescendantPartialPermission:
+    def test_apply_to_all_descendant_expansion_respects_per_object_permissions(
+        self,
+        rest_api_client,
+    ):
+        """
+        GIVEN:
+            - A tag hierarchy (parent -> permitted_child, unpermitted_child)
+            - A non-superuser requester with object-level change_tag granted
+              on the parent and on only ONE of the two children
+        WHEN:
+            - bulk_edit_objects is called with all=True and a filter that
+              matches only the root (parent) tag, engaging the
+              tag-descendant-expansion logic in BulkEditObjectsView.post
+        THEN:
+            - The descendant expansion only pulls in descendants the
+              requester actually has permission on: the permitted child's
+              owner is reassigned alongside the parent's, while the
+              unpermitted child keeps its original owner. This pins that the
+              expansion checks per-object permissions (editable_ids), not
+              merely "is a descendant of a filter match".
+
+        NOTE: this uses ``set_permissions`` (owner reassignment) rather than
+        ``delete`` as the operation, because Tag.tn_parent (django-treenode)
+        cascades deletes to descendants at the database/ORM level regardless
+        of which tags the view resolved into ``objs`` -- a delete-based test
+        would pass/fail based on FK cascade behavior, not on whether the
+        descendant-expansion logic itself respected per-object permissions.
+        """
+        owner = User.objects.create_user(username="tag_hierarchy_owner")
+        requester = User.objects.create_user(username="tag_hierarchy_requester")
+        # global change_tag permission so the has_perm() gate passes and the
+        # object-level permitted_object_ids filtering is what's under test
+        requester.user_permissions.add(
+            Permission.objects.get(codename="change_tag"),
+        )
+        rest_api_client.force_authenticate(user=requester)
+
+        parent = TagFactory(owner=owner, name="parent-tag")
+        permitted_child = TagFactory(
+            owner=owner,
+            name="permitted-child-tag",
+            tn_parent=parent,
+        )
+        unpermitted_child = TagFactory(
+            owner=owner,
+            name="unpermitted-child-tag",
+            tn_parent=parent,
+        )
+        assign_perm("change_tag", requester, parent)
+        assign_perm("change_tag", requester, permitted_child)
+        # unpermitted_child is intentionally NOT granted change_tag
+
+        response = rest_api_client.post(
+            "/api/bulk_edit_objects/",
+            {
+                "object_type": "tags",
+                "operation": "set_permissions",
+                "all": True,
+                "filters": {"is_root": True},
+                "owner": requester.pk,
+            },
+            format="json",
+        )
+        assert response.status_code == HTTPStatus.OK
+
+        parent.refresh_from_db()
+        permitted_child.refresh_from_db()
+        unpermitted_child.refresh_from_db()
+        assert parent.owner == requester
+        assert permitted_child.owner == requester
+        assert unpermitted_child.owner == owner

src/documents/views.py

@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ from documents.permissions import has_global_statistics_permission
 from documents.permissions import has_perms_owner_aware
 from documents.permissions import has_system_status_permission
 from documents.permissions import permitted_document_ids
+from documents.permissions import permitted_object_ids
 from documents.permissions import set_permissions_for_object
 from documents.plugins.date_parsing import get_date_parser
 from documents.schema import generate_object_with_permissions_schema
@@ -4764,10 +4765,8 @@ class BulkEditObjectsView(PassUserMixin):
                 "document_types": DocumentTypeFilterSet,
                 "storage_paths": StoragePathFilterSet,
             }[object_type]
-            user_permitted_objects = get_objects_for_user_owner_aware(
-                user,
-                perm_codename,
-                object_class,
+            user_permitted_objects = object_class.objects.filter(
+                id__in=permitted_object_ids(user, object_class, perm_codename),
             )
             objs = filterset_class(
                 data=filters,
@@ -4792,8 +4791,9 @@ class BulkEditObjectsView(PassUserMixin):
 
         if not user.is_superuser:
             perm = f"documents.{perm_codename}"
+            permitted_ids = set(permitted_object_ids(user, object_class, perm_codename))
             has_perms = user.has_perm(perm) and all(
-                has_perms_owner_aware(user, perm_codename, obj) for obj in objs
+                obj.pk in permitted_ids for obj in objs
             )
 
             if not has_perms: