Files
json/tests/benchmarks/README.md
T
Niels Lohmann 0f6c4dda11 Add json_document and json_view: node index, parser, and document
Add json_document and json_view, a read-only, zero-copy index of a
JSON text, as the first public slice of the zero-copy view (#5295).

A parse produces a flat array of 16-byte nodes in document order,
one per value and one per object key. Strings stay in the source
text; escaped strings are decoded into an arena. Integers are
converted while their digits are in the cache; floats keep only
their digit layout and are converted on read. Containers store the
size of their subtree, so a reader can step over one in constant
time. A document makes a handful of allocations, however many
values it has.

The parser accepts exactly what json::parse accepts, with every
combination of ignore_comments and ignore_trailing_commas, with and
without a trailing NUL, and under JSON_STRICT_NUL_HANDLING. It is
portable C++11 and does not depend on byte order.

basic_json_document adds parse, parse_copy, accept, read (reuses a
document's memory), root, is_discarded, source, owns_source,
node_count, memory_usage, and shrink_to_fit. basic_json_view adds
type, the is_* queries, operator bool, size, empty, materialize,
and source_offset. A parse error throws the same exception
basic_json::parse would throw for the same input, message and
position included.

detail::abi_config keeps JSON_STRICT_NUL_HANDLING and
JSON_USE_LEGACY_DISCARDED_VALUE_COMPARISON readable after json.hpp
undefines them, in the ABI namespace so they always match the
basic_json in use.

A NUL byte that ends a // comment is the end of the input, as in
parse() since #5696.

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
2026-10-14 17:53:03 +02:00

146 lines
8.0 KiB
Markdown

# Benchmarks
Micro-benchmarks for parsing, serialization and the binary formats, written with
[Google Benchmark](https://github.com/google/benchmark). They are not run by CI; see
[When to run them](#when-to-run-them).
## What is measured
| benchmark | what it does |
|---|---|
| `ParseFile`, `ParseString` | parse JSON from a file stream or a string |
| `Accept` | validate JSON from a string (`json::accept`) |
| `ParseIndented` | parse the large files re-indented by 4 spaces, for the lexer's whitespace handling |
| `Dump` | serialize, compact (`-`) and indented (`4`) |
| `ToCbor`, `BinaryToCbor` | write CBOR; `BinaryToCbor` writes binary values of growing size |
| `FromMsgpack` | read MessagePack; unchanged over the years, so its numbers stay comparable across releases |
| `FromBinaryBuffer`, `FromBinaryFile` | read CBOR, MessagePack, UBJSON, BJData and BSON from a buffer or a `FILE*` |
| `FromBinaryShape` | read deeply nested, container-heavy and scalar-heavy documents in every binary format |
| `FromCborChunkedString` | read CBOR strings split into indefinite-length chunks |
| `ViewParse`, `ViewRead` | parse with [`json_document`](https://json.nlohmann.me/features/json_view/) into a new document, or into one that is reused; compare with `ParseString` |
| `ViewParseIndented` | as `ParseIndented`, with a reused `json_document` |
| `ViewAccept` | validate with `json_document::accept`; compare with `Accept` |
| `ViewMaterialize` | convert a parsed `json_document` into a `json` value |
The input files are those of [nativejson-benchmark](https://github.com/miloyip/nativejson-benchmark) (`canada`,
`citm_catalog`, `twitter`), a large `jeopardy` file, and number-heavy files (`floats`, `signed_ints`, ...).
`bytes_per_second` counts the bytes read or written: the JSON text when parsing, the output when serializing.
## Requirements
- CMake 3.14 or later, a C++11 compiler, and Ninja for the `make` target.
- Network access on the first configure: CMake downloads Google Benchmark and the
[test data](https://github.com/nlohmann/json_test_data) into the build directory. To reuse a download of the test
data, pass `-DJSON_TestDataDirectory=<build directory>/test_files`.
- Google Benchmark is fetched as a fixed release with a checksum, so that every build uses the same
code and a download cannot change under you. It is updated like any other dependency when a new release comes out:
change `JSON_GOOGLE_BENCHMARK_VERSION` and the archive's `URL_HASH` in `CMakeLists.txt` together. Results are kept
comparable by building both sides of a comparison with the same version, not by keeping that version forever (see
[Comparing two versions](#comparing-two-versions)).
- The benchmarks include `single_include/nlohmann/json.hpp`, so run `make amalgamate` after changing anything in
`include/`.
GCC and Clang builds use `-O3 -flto -DNDEBUG`.
## Running them
From the repository root, this builds everything from scratch in `cmake-build-benchmarks` and runs all benchmarks:
```sh
make run_benchmarks
```
To build once and run selectively:
```sh
cmake -S tests/benchmarks -B build-benchmarks -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
cmake --build build-benchmarks
build-benchmarks/json_benchmarks --benchmark_filter='ParseString|Dump'
```
Useful options of `json_benchmarks`:
| option | effect |
|---|---|
| `--benchmark_list_tests` | list the benchmarks instead of running them |
| `--benchmark_filter=<regex>` | run only the benchmarks whose names match |
| `--benchmark_repetitions=<n>` | run every benchmark `n` times and add mean, median, standard deviation and coefficient of variation |
| `--benchmark_enable_random_interleaving=true` | run the repetitions in random order, which spreads out drifts such as thermal throttling |
| `--benchmark_min_time=<seconds>s` | run each benchmark at least this long (e.g. `2s`) |
| `--benchmark_out=<file> --benchmark_out_format=json` | also write the results to a file, e.g. for `compare.py` |
## Reading the output
Each line shows the wall-clock `Time` and the `CPU` time per iteration, the number of `Iterations` Google Benchmark
chose, and the throughput in `bytes_per_second`. With repetitions, the lines ending in `_median` are the ones to
compare. A `_cv` (coefficient of variation) above a few percent means the machine was too noisy for small
differences to mean anything.
## Comparing two versions
To see what a change or a release did, build the same benchmarks twice: once against the header of the version to
compare with, and once against the current one. `JSON_BENCHMARK_INCLUDE_DIR` names the directory holding the
`nlohmann/json.hpp` to benchmark. For example, to compare the current checkout with 3.12.0:
```sh
# the header of the version to compare with
mkdir -p build-baseline-header/nlohmann
git show v3.12.0:single_include/nlohmann/json.hpp > build-baseline-header/nlohmann/json.hpp
# the same benchmarks, built against either header
cmake -S tests/benchmarks -B build-baseline -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DJSON_BENCHMARK_INCLUDE_DIR="$PWD/build-baseline-header"
cmake -S tests/benchmarks -B build-current -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
cmake --build build-baseline
cmake --build build-current
# run both, back to back
build-baseline/json_benchmarks --benchmark_repetitions=10 --benchmark_enable_random_interleaving=true \
--benchmark_out=build-baseline/results.json --benchmark_out_format=json
build-current/json_benchmarks --benchmark_repetitions=10 --benchmark_enable_random_interleaving=true \
--benchmark_out=build-current/results.json --benchmark_out_format=json
```
Google Benchmark ships a tool to compare the two result files. It needs NumPy and SciPy:
```sh
python3 -m venv build-venv
build-venv/bin/pip install numpy scipy
build-venv/bin/python build-current/_deps/benchmark-src/tools/compare.py -a benchmarks build-baseline/results.json build-current/results.json
```
The tool's own `tools/requirements.txt` pins NumPy and SciPy versions that need Python 3.11 or later; with an older
Python, unpinned versions work as well. In its output:
- the `Time` and `CPU` columns are relative changes: `-0.35` means 35% faster, `+0.10` means 10% slower;
- `_pvalue` lines report a Mann-Whitney U test of whether the two versions differ. It needs at least 9
repetitions, and a p-value below 0.05 means the difference is unlikely to be noise;
- `OVERALL_GEOMEAN` summarizes all benchmarks;
- `-a` shows only the aggregates, not every repetition.
Both builds use the same Google Benchmark, the one `CMakeLists.txt` names, so only the header differs. For the same
reason, do not compare against result files from an earlier checkout: a different Google Benchmark, compiler or
machine state can shift the numbers as much as the change under test. Rerun the baseline instead.
The header you compare with must support everything the benchmarks use. The current benchmarks build against 3.12.0;
the `View*` benchmarks (in `src/benchmarks_view.cpp`) are only built if the directory also holds
`nlohmann/json_view.hpp`.
Only benchmarks present in both result files are compared, so for older releases, either filter the benchmarks or
build that release's own `tests/benchmarks` against its own header.
## Getting stable numbers
- Build and run both versions on the same machine with the same compiler and Google Benchmark, one right after the
other.
- Keep the machine otherwise idle: no builds, no browser, and a laptop plugged in.
- On Linux, set the CPU frequency governor to `performance`, e.g. `sudo cpupower frequency-set --governor performance`.
Google Benchmark prints a warning when frequency scaling is enabled. Pinning the process to a core
(`taskset -c 2 ...`) helps as well.
- Use 10 or more repetitions with random interleaving, compare medians, and treat changes within the `_cv` as noise.
## When to run them
They are a manual step, not part of CI: shared CI runners vary more between runs than most of the effects measured.
Run the comparison above before a release, comparing the previous release tag with `develop`, and for pull requests
that claim to change performance.