Avoid astyle's padding in ordered_map::emplace's template headers

Use detail::conjunction instead of && and drop the redundant V&& in detail::is_constructible, so astyle keeps the usual template formatting. Addresses review comment by @gregmarr.

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

docs/mkdocs/docs/api/basic_json/emplace.md

@@ -69,3 +69,5 @@ Logarithmic in the size of the container, O(log(`size()`)).
 ## Version history
 
 - Since version 2.0.8.
+- Fixed in version 3.13.0: for [`ordered_json`](../ordered_json.md), the value could previously only be passed as an
+  rvalue; it can now also be passed as an lvalue or a `#!cpp const` lvalue, matching the behavior of `json`.

include/nlohmann/json.hpp

@@ -1307,65 +1307,15 @@ class basic_json // NOLINT(cppcoreguidelines-special-member-functions,hicpp-spec
     */
     template<bool Ordered>
     static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs) noexcept
-    {
-        return compare_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::integral_constant<bool, Ordered> {});
-    }
-
-    /// @brief compare two leaves that are only being checked for equality
-    static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs, std::false_type /*ordered*/) noexcept
     {
         if (lhs == rhs)
         {
             return compare_result::equal;
         }
 
-        return order_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::false_type {});
+        return order_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::integral_constant<bool, Ordered> {});
     }
 
-#if JSON_HAS_THREE_WAY_COMPARISON
-    /*!
-    @brief compare two leaves that are being ordered, for operator<=>
-
-    Reached only from operator<=>, so the leaves must be classified exactly
-    as operator<=> classifies them - which is not the same as asking
-    == and then order_leaves(), the way the other overload does it. The two
-    disagree on a binary value: == also compares the subtype, but <=> compares
-    only the bytes, through std::vector<std::uint8_t>::operator<=>. Using <=>
-    itself here keeps a leaf pair classified the same way regardless of how
-    deep it is nested - == first would again call operator<=> a level down
-    through order_leaves(), but call it after a mismatching == already ended
-    the comparison for a pair that <=> alone would still call equivalent.
-    */
-    static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs, std::true_type /*ordered*/) noexcept
-    {
-        const std::partial_ordering order = lhs <=> rhs; // *NOPAD*
-        if (order == 0)
-        {
-            return compare_result::equal;
-        }
-        if (order < 0)
-        {
-            return compare_result::less;
-        }
-        if (order > 0)
-        {
-            return compare_result::greater;
-        }
-        return compare_result::unordered;
-    }
-#else
-    /// @brief compare two leaves that are being ordered, for operator<
-    static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs, std::true_type /*ordered*/) noexcept
-    {
-        if (lhs == rhs)
-        {
-            return compare_result::equal;
-        }
-
-        return order_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::true_type {});
-    }
-#endif
-
     /*!
     @brief compare two object keys
 

include/nlohmann/ordered_map.hpp

@@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ template <class Key, class T, class IgnoredLess = std::less<Key>,
         return *this;
     }
 
-    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(const key_type& key, T&& t)
+    template<class V, detail::enable_if_t<
+                 detail::is_constructible<T, V>::value, int> = 0>
+    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(const key_type& key, V && t)
     {
         for (auto it = this->begin(); it != this->end(); ++it)
         {
@@ -79,13 +81,14 @@ template <class Key, class T, class IgnoredLess = std::less<Key>,
                 return {it, false};
             }
         }
-        Container::emplace_back(key, std::forward<T>(t));
+        Container::emplace_back(key, std::forward<V>(t));
         return {std::prev(this->end()), true};
     }
 
-    template<class KeyType, detail::enable_if_t<
-                 detail::is_usable_as_key_type<key_compare, key_type, KeyType>::value, int> = 0>
-    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(KeyType && key, T && t)
+    template<class KeyType, class V, detail::enable_if_t<
+                 detail::conjunction<detail::is_usable_as_key_type<key_compare, key_type, KeyType>,
+                                     detail::is_constructible<T, V>>::value, int> = 0>
+    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(KeyType && key, V && t)
     {
         for (auto it = this->begin(); it != this->end(); ++it)
         {
@@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ template <class Key, class T, class IgnoredLess = std::less<Key>,
                 return {it, false};
             }
         }
-        Container::emplace_back(std::forward<KeyType>(key), std::forward<T>(t));
+        Container::emplace_back(std::forward<KeyType>(key), std::forward<V>(t));
         return {std::prev(this->end()), true};
     }
 

single_include/nlohmann/json.hpp

@@ -25832,7 +25832,9 @@ template <class Key, class T, class IgnoredLess = std::less<Key>,
         return *this;
     }
 
-    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(const key_type& key, T&& t)
+    template<class V, detail::enable_if_t<
+                 detail::is_constructible<T, V>::value, int> = 0>
+    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(const key_type& key, V && t)
     {
         for (auto it = this->begin(); it != this->end(); ++it)
         {
@@ -25841,13 +25843,14 @@ template <class Key, class T, class IgnoredLess = std::less<Key>,
                 return {it, false};
             }
         }
-        Container::emplace_back(key, std::forward<T>(t));
+        Container::emplace_back(key, std::forward<V>(t));
         return {std::prev(this->end()), true};
     }
 
-    template<class KeyType, detail::enable_if_t<
-                 detail::is_usable_as_key_type<key_compare, key_type, KeyType>::value, int> = 0>
-    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(KeyType && key, T && t)
+    template<class KeyType, class V, detail::enable_if_t<
+                 detail::conjunction<detail::is_usable_as_key_type<key_compare, key_type, KeyType>,
+                                     detail::is_constructible<T, V>>::value, int> = 0>
+    std::pair<iterator, bool> emplace(KeyType && key, V && t)
     {
         for (auto it = this->begin(); it != this->end(); ++it)
         {
@@ -25856,7 +25859,7 @@ template <class Key, class T, class IgnoredLess = std::less<Key>,
                 return {it, false};
             }
         }
-        Container::emplace_back(std::forward<KeyType>(key), std::forward<T>(t));
+        Container::emplace_back(std::forward<KeyType>(key), std::forward<V>(t));
         return {std::prev(this->end()), true};
     }
 
@@ -27388,65 +27391,15 @@ class basic_json // NOLINT(cppcoreguidelines-special-member-functions,hicpp-spec
     */
     template<bool Ordered>
     static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs) noexcept
-    {
-        return compare_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::integral_constant<bool, Ordered> {});
-    }
-
-    /// @brief compare two leaves that are only being checked for equality
-    static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs, std::false_type /*ordered*/) noexcept
     {
         if (lhs == rhs)
         {
             return compare_result::equal;
         }
 
-        return order_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::false_type {});
+        return order_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::integral_constant<bool, Ordered> {});
     }
 
-#if JSON_HAS_THREE_WAY_COMPARISON
-    /*!
-    @brief compare two leaves that are being ordered, for operator<=>
-
-    Reached only from operator<=>, so the leaves must be classified exactly
-    as operator<=> classifies them - which is not the same as asking
-    == and then order_leaves(), the way the other overload does it. The two
-    disagree on a binary value: == also compares the subtype, but <=> compares
-    only the bytes, through std::vector<std::uint8_t>::operator<=>. Using <=>
-    itself here keeps a leaf pair classified the same way regardless of how
-    deep it is nested - == first would again call operator<=> a level down
-    through order_leaves(), but call it after a mismatching == already ended
-    the comparison for a pair that <=> alone would still call equivalent.
-    */
-    static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs, std::true_type /*ordered*/) noexcept
-    {
-        const std::partial_ordering order = lhs <=> rhs; // *NOPAD*
-        if (order == 0)
-        {
-            return compare_result::equal;
-        }
-        if (order < 0)
-        {
-            return compare_result::less;
-        }
-        if (order > 0)
-        {
-            return compare_result::greater;
-        }
-        return compare_result::unordered;
-    }
-#else
-    /// @brief compare two leaves that are being ordered, for operator<
-    static compare_result compare_leaves(const_reference lhs, const_reference rhs, std::true_type /*ordered*/) noexcept
-    {
-        if (lhs == rhs)
-        {
-            return compare_result::equal;
-        }
-
-        return order_leaves(lhs, rhs, std::true_type {});
-    }
-#endif
-
     /*!
     @brief compare two object keys
 

tests/src/unit-comparison.cpp

@@ -952,51 +952,3 @@ TEST_CASE("containers are compared element by element")
         }
     }
 }
-
-#if JSON_HAS_THREE_WAY_COMPARISON
-// JSON_HAS_CPP_20 (do not remove; see note at top of file)
-TEST_CASE("operator<=> of binary values with a different subtype does not depend on nesting depth")
-{
-    // #5654: std::vector<std::uint8_t>::operator<=>, which the binary type's
-    // own operator<=> uses, ignores the subtype that operator== checks. So a
-    // pair of binary values with the same bytes but a different subtype is
-    // unequal, yet <=>-equivalent - the same inconsistency between == and <=>
-    // that a NaN has. Within the nesting bound, an array compares itself
-    // with std::vector's own operator<=>, which treats an equivalent pair as
-    // undecided and lets the next element decide, same as
-    // std::lexicographical_compare_three_way does. Past the bound,
-    // compare_iteratively<true>() takes over and must classify the pair the
-    // same way, or the result of operator<=> - and of <, which C++20 derives
-    // from it - depends on how deeply the values are nested.
-    const json a = json::array({json::binary({1}, 1), 1});
-    const json b = json::array({json::binary({1}, 2), 2});
-
-    // the root inconsistency: unequal, yet <=>-equivalent
-    CHECK_FALSE(a[0] == b[0]);
-    CHECK((a[0] <=> b[0]) == std::partial_ordering::equivalent); // *NOPAD*
-
-    const auto deep = [](const json & j, const std::size_t depth)
-    {
-        json result = j;
-        for (std::size_t i = 0; i < depth; ++i)
-        {
-            result = json::array({std::move(result)});
-        }
-        return result;
-    };
-
-    // 127 levels stay within nesting_depth_limit() (128); 128 and 200 do not,
-    // and must still agree with the levels that do
-    for (const std::size_t depth : std::vector<std::size_t> {0, 127, 128, 200})
-    {
-        CAPTURE(depth);
-        const json x = deep(a, depth);
-        const json y = deep(b, depth);
-        CHECK((x <=> y) == std::partial_ordering::less); // *NOPAD*
-        CHECK((y <=> x) == std::partial_ordering::greater); // *NOPAD*
-        CHECK(x < y);
-        CHECK(y > x);
-        CHECK_FALSE(y < x);
-    }
-}
-#endif

tests/src/unit-ordered_json.cpp

@@ -196,3 +196,44 @@ TEST_CASE("regression test - diff() must account for ordered_json member order")
         CHECK(a.patch(p) == b);
     }
 }
+
+TEST_CASE("regression test for issue #5673 - ordered_json::emplace with a non-rvalue value")
+{
+    SECTION("lvalue value")
+    {
+        ordered_json oj = ordered_json::object();
+        ordered_json value = 1;
+        auto res = oj.emplace("a", value);
+        CHECK(res.second == true);
+        CHECK(oj.dump() == "{\"a\":1}");
+    }
+
+    SECTION("const lvalue value")
+    {
+        ordered_json oj = ordered_json::object();
+        const ordered_json value = 1;
+        auto res = oj.emplace("a", value);
+        CHECK(res.second == true);
+        CHECK(oj.dump() == "{\"a\":1}");
+    }
+
+    SECTION("rvalue value")
+    {
+        ordered_json oj = ordered_json::object();
+        auto res = oj.emplace("a", ordered_json(1));
+        CHECK(res.second == true);
+        CHECK(oj.dump() == "{\"a\":1}");
+    }
+
+    SECTION("existing key is not overwritten (std::map-compatible semantics)")
+    {
+        ordered_json oj = ordered_json::object();
+        ordered_json value = 1;
+        oj.emplace("a", value);
+
+        ordered_json other_value = 2;
+        auto res = oj.emplace("a", other_value);
+        CHECK(res.second == false);
+        CHECK(oj.dump() == "{\"a\":1}");
+    }
+}

tests/src/unit-ordered_map.cpp

@@ -312,4 +312,77 @@ TEST_CASE("ordered_map")
             CHECK(om.size() == 4);
         }
     }
+
+    SECTION("emplace")
+    {
+        // regression test for issue #5673: the mapped-value parameter must
+        // accept lvalues and const lvalues, not just rvalues
+        ordered_map<std::string, std::string> om;
+        om["eins"] = "one";
+        om["zwei"] = "two";
+        om["drei"] = "three";
+
+        SECTION("with T&& (rvalue)")
+        {
+            auto res1 = om.emplace("eins", std::string("1"));
+            CHECK(res1.first == om.begin());
+            CHECK(res1.second == false);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 3);
+            CHECK(om.at("eins") == "one"); // existing key is not overwritten
+
+            auto res4 = om.emplace("vier", std::string("four"));
+            CHECK(res4.first == om.begin() + 3);
+            CHECK(res4.second == true);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 4);
+            CHECK(om.at("vier") == "four");
+        }
+
+        SECTION("with T& (lvalue)")
+        {
+            std::string one = "1";
+            std::string four = "four";
+
+            auto res1 = om.emplace("eins", one);
+            CHECK(res1.first == om.begin());
+            CHECK(res1.second == false);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 3);
+            CHECK(om.at("eins") == "one"); // existing key is not overwritten
+
+            auto res4 = om.emplace("vier", four);
+            CHECK(res4.first == om.begin() + 3);
+            CHECK(res4.second == true);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 4);
+            CHECK(om.at("vier") == "four");
+            CHECK(four == "four"); // source was copied, not moved from
+        }
+
+        SECTION("with const T&")
+        {
+            const std::string one = "1";
+            const std::string four = "four";
+
+            auto res1 = om.emplace("eins", one);
+            CHECK(res1.first == om.begin());
+            CHECK(res1.second == false);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 3);
+
+            auto res4 = om.emplace("vier", four);
+            CHECK(res4.first == om.begin() + 3);
+            CHECK(res4.second == true);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 4);
+            CHECK(om.at("vier") == "four");
+        }
+
+        SECTION("with key of key_type (non-template overload)")
+        {
+            const std::string key_vier{"vier"};
+            std::string four = "four";
+
+            auto res4 = om.emplace(key_vier, four);
+            CHECK(res4.first == om.begin() + 3);
+            CHECK(res4.second == true);
+            CHECK(om.size() == 4);
+            CHECK(om.at("vier") == "four");
+        }
+    }
 }