Files
paperless-ngx/src/paperless_ai/tests/test_base_model.py
T

171 lines
6.3 KiB
Python

from paperless_ai.base_model import MAX_DATES
from paperless_ai.base_model import MAX_EXISTING_IDS
from paperless_ai.base_model import MAX_NEW_NAMES
from paperless_ai.base_model import MAX_TITLE_LENGTH
from paperless_ai.base_model import ClassificationSuggestions
from paperless_ai.base_model import DocumentClassifierSchema
from paperless_ai.base_model import TaxonomyChoice
from paperless_ai.base_model import TaxonomyChoiceDict
def test_document_classifier_schema_declared_defaults():
"""
GIVEN:
- A DocumentClassifierSchema constructed with only the required
title field
WHEN:
- The schema is dumped to a dict via model_dump()
THEN:
- Every taxonomy field dumps as an empty existing_ids/new_names
dict, and dates dumps as an empty list
This is the one project-owned fact worth pinning down here: which
defaults this schema declares for a partial LLM response (see
client.py's DocumentClassifierSchema(**json.loads(...)) call sites,
which construct from whatever subset of fields the backend actually
returned). It deliberately hardcodes the expected literal rather than
re-deriving it from TaxonomyChoice()/[] - pydantic's own
default_factory machinery is not this project's to re-test, and a
test that recomputes the expected value from the model under test
can't ever catch a wrong default.
"""
schema = DocumentClassifierSchema(title="Test Title")
dumped = schema.model_dump()
empty_choice = {"existing_ids": [], "new_names": []}
assert dumped["tags"] == empty_choice
assert dumped["correspondents"] == empty_choice
assert dumped["document_types"] == empty_choice
assert dumped["storage_paths"] == empty_choice
assert dumped["dates"] == []
def test_document_classifier_schema_json_schema_is_self_contained():
"""
GIVEN:
- The DocumentClassifierSchema pydantic model
WHEN:
- Its JSON schema is generated via model_json_schema()
THEN:
- $defs includes a fully-resolvable TaxonomyChoice definition with
existing_ids/new_names properties
client.py hands this generated schema straight to the LLM backend as
the response-format constraint (Ollama's format=json_schema, and the
OpenAI-like tool-calling path). What that backend actually needs is a
self-contained schema it can resolve without a document loader -
unlike a bare "$ref present" check, this asserts the referenced
definition genuinely carries the two fields the rest of the pipeline
(parse_ai_response, matching.py's resolve_*_ids) relies on.
"""
schema = DocumentClassifierSchema.model_json_schema()
defs = schema.get("$defs", {})
assert "TaxonomyChoice" in defs
taxonomy_choice_properties = defs["TaxonomyChoice"]["properties"]
assert set(taxonomy_choice_properties.keys()) == {"existing_ids", "new_names"}
def test_every_sequence_in_the_emitted_schema_is_bounded():
"""
GIVEN:
- The DocumentClassifierSchema pydantic model
WHEN:
- Its JSON schema is generated via model_json_schema()
THEN:
- Every array property in the schema, including those on the
referenced TaxonomyChoice definition, carries a maxItems
"""
schema = DocumentClassifierSchema.model_json_schema()
unbounded = [
f"{owner}.{name}"
for owner, definition in [
("DocumentClassifierSchema", schema),
*schema.get("$defs", {}).items(),
]
for name, prop in definition.get("properties", {}).items()
if prop.get("type") == "array" and "maxItems" not in prop
]
assert unbounded == []
def test_dates_bound_matches_what_the_prompt_asks_for():
"""
GIVEN:
- The DocumentClassifierSchema pydantic model
WHEN:
- The emitted maxItems for dates is inspected
THEN:
- It equals the 3 that build_prompt_without_rag asks the model for
"""
dates_schema = DocumentClassifierSchema.model_json_schema()["properties"]["dates"]
assert dates_schema["maxItems"] == MAX_DATES == 3
def test_over_long_response_is_truncated_rather_than_rejected():
"""
GIVEN:
- An LLM response overshooting every declared bound
WHEN:
- DocumentClassifierSchema is constructed from it
THEN:
- Each field is clipped to its maximum, with no ValidationError
"""
parsed = DocumentClassifierSchema(
title="T" * (MAX_TITLE_LENGTH + 50),
tags=TaxonomyChoice(
existing_ids=list(range(MAX_EXISTING_IDS + 20)),
new_names=["n"] * (MAX_NEW_NAMES + 20),
),
dates=[f"2016-{month:02d}-01" for month in range(1, 13)],
)
assert len(parsed.title) == MAX_TITLE_LENGTH
assert len(parsed.dates) == MAX_DATES
assert len(parsed.tags.existing_ids) == MAX_EXISTING_IDS
assert len(parsed.tags.new_names) == MAX_NEW_NAMES
def test_truncation_keeps_the_earliest_entries():
"""
GIVEN:
- An over-long dates list from an LLM response
WHEN:
- DocumentClassifierSchema is constructed from it
THEN:
- The kept entries are the first ones the model emitted
"""
parsed = DocumentClassifierSchema(
title="T",
dates=["2016-10-01", "2016-09-01", "2016-08-01", "2016-07-01", "2016-06-01"],
)
assert parsed.dates == ["2016-10-01", "2016-09-01", "2016-08-01"]
def test_model_dump_matches_typed_dict_keys():
"""
GIVEN:
- A DocumentClassifierSchema instance
WHEN:
- It is dumped to a dict via model_dump()
THEN:
- The dumped dict's keys exactly match ClassificationSuggestions'
declared keys
- The dumped tags dict's keys exactly match TaxonomyChoiceDict's
declared keys
"""
# TaxonomyChoiceDict/ClassificationSuggestions are the static-typing
# counterparts of TaxonomyChoice/DocumentClassifierSchema - this pins
# down that .model_dump()'s actual runtime keys are exactly what the
# TypedDicts declare, so the two don't silently drift apart.
schema = DocumentClassifierSchema(title="T", tags=TaxonomyChoice(existing_ids=[1]))
dumped = schema.model_dump()
assert set(dumped.keys()) == set(ClassificationSuggestions.__annotations__.keys())
assert set(dumped["tags"].keys()) == set(TaxonomyChoiceDict.__annotations__.keys())