mirror of
https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx.git
synced 2026-08-26 20:53:20 +00:00
stumpylogandClaude Opus 5
b3e3d8b23e
The previous commit's warning said a timestamp carrying a time of day was
not understood at all, and told users to fall back to whole-day range
bounds. Both halves were wrong. Only the bare unquoted spelling fails:
added:2005-01-01T00:00:00Z -> no match
added:"2005-01-01T00:00:00Z" -> matches
added:[2005-01-01T00:00:00Z to 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z] -> matches
That is the ordinary quoting rule the surrounding docs already state, the
same one "-1 week" and "next monday" obey, so present the timestamp as a
working form rather than as a limitation and drop the false workaround:
range bounds carrying a time of day work fine.
A bound must be bare inside range brackets, where quoting it is rejected
outright, so document both halves of the rule rather than just "quote it".
Keep the zero-width warning distinct from the quoting rule now sitting above
it, since a reader who just learned quoting rescues "next monday" would
otherwise assume it rescues "-3 days". It does not: re-verified against
documents added at exactly those instants, the quoted offsets still match
only that one instant.
Pin the working spellings, which is the assertion that was missing: nothing
covered the quoted or range-bound forms, so a regression of a working
feature went undetected. Also pin that quoting does not rescue the
zero-width group.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>