* perf: resolve permitted_document_ids once before email/share loops
Replaces per-document has_perms_owner_aware calls in the email-document
action and bulk share-link-bundle creation with a single
permitted_document_ids(request.user) resolution before the loop,
reducing DB round-trips while preserving identical permission
semantics (including the per-document error message on the bundle
endpoint).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GRp4kf1mdn9ruv81zWAmh2
* perf: resolve permitted_document_ids(perm=change_document) once before bulk-edit loops
Migrates the bulk document edit permission check in views.py and the
custom-field DOCUMENTLINK validator in serialisers.py off of
has_perms_owner_aware-per-document loops, resolving
permitted_document_ids(user, perm="change_document") once instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GRp4kf1mdn9ruv81zWAmh2
* perf: resolve permitted_document_ids once for root-document version-listing loop
BulkDownloadView.post() previously called has_perms_owner_aware() per row
inside the loop that resolves each document's root and latest version.
Resolve permitted_document_ids(request.user) once before the loop and check
membership by root_doc.pk instead, consistent with the other consolidated
permission-filtering sites.
* test: use HTTPStatus enum instead of bare integers in security test assertions
* perf: resolve permitted_document_ids(perm=delete_document, include_deleted=True) once for trash loop
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GRp4kf1mdn9ruv81zWAmh2
* perf: drop unused select_related("owner") from email_documents
The permission check loop that used to call has_perms_owner_aware()
(which read .owner) was already replaced with permitted_document_ids()
resolved once into a set. No other code in email_documents touches
.owner, so the select_related is dead weight.
* test: repurpose inert grant into mixed-batch bulk-edit rejection case
The unrelated view_document grant in
test_bulk_edit_rejects_document_without_change_permission created a
document that was never referenced in the request payload. Turn it
into a genuinely useful case instead: a mixed batch containing one
document the requester is fully permitted to change alongside one
they are not, proving bulk_edit rejects the whole batch when any
document lacks change permission (not just checking the first/last
document in the list).
* test: add version-only-grant case discriminating root-vs-version permission check
The former "stranger" sub-case in
test_permission_checked_on_root_not_on_version had zero grants on either
root or version, so it passed under any implementation, correct or
buggy. Replace it with a user granted view_document on the version
itself (not the root): this only passes if bulk_download truly checks
root-only, catching a regression to "root OR version" that the old
case could never detect.
* perf: check permitted document IDs via DB-side exclude/exists instead of materializing the full set
email_documents, _has_document_permissions, TrashView.post, and
validate_documentlink_targets each resolved permitted_document_ids() into
a full Python set just to check membership for a small, bounded batch of
request document IDs. For a user with broad permitted access that pulls
their entire visible/editable document count into memory and across the
wire regardless of how many documents the request actually touches.
Pushing the membership check into the DB via exclude(...).exists() scales
with the request's batch size instead, without reintroducing the
per-row guardian join pathology from #13276 (confirmed via EXPLAIN
ANALYZE: the permission subplans are hashed once, not re-executed per
outer row).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Trenton H
shamoon
Sebastian Steinbeißer