tests/src/round_trip_corpus.hpp exists so that the byte-stability invariant the fuzzer drivers check also runs on a fixed corpus in CI, instead of only at OSS-Fuzz. So far only the UBJSON and BJData drivers had a matching unit test; the CBOR, MessagePack, BSON and BON8 drivers assert the same invariant (assert(to_X(j2) == vec)) but nothing ran it outside OSS-Fuzz. Add "<FORMAT> round-trip invariants" test cases to unit-cbor.cpp, unit-msgpack.cpp, unit-bson.cpp and unit-bon8.cpp, modeled on the UBJSON case: seed j1 from the corpus (skipping values that do not survive the format's own round trip, as the fuzzer drivers only ever see values from_X() actually produced), then require from_X(to_X(j1)) not to throw and check to_X(j2) == to_X(j1). BSON only serializes objects, so non-object corpus values are skipped. Update the comments in round_trip_corpus.hpp and tests/fuzzing.md to name all six formats. The stream-versus-contiguous check in the BON8 driver is left out, as #5601 reworks it. A local probe confirms no violations on the current corpus (CBOR 3849 checked, MessagePack 3909, BSON 2958, BON8 3841 - matching the counts already recorded for this probe in the issue). Closes #5714 item 1. Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
4.9 KiB
Fuzz testing
Each parser of the library (JSON, BJData, BON8, BSON, CBOR, MessagePack, and UBJSON) can be fuzz tested. Currently, libFuzzer and afl++ are supported.
Corpus creation
For most effective fuzzing, a corpus should be provided. A corpus is a directory with some simple input files that cover several features of the parser and is hence a good starting point for mutations.
TEST_DATA_VERSION=3.2.0
wget https://github.com/nlohmann/json_test_data/archive/refs/tags/v$TEST_DATA_VERSION.zip
unzip v$TEST_DATA_VERSION.zip
rm v$TEST_DATA_VERSION.zip
for FORMAT in json bjdata bon8 bson cbor msgpack ubjson
do
rm -fr corpus_$FORMAT
mkdir corpus_$FORMAT
find json_test_data-$TEST_DATA_VERSION -size -5k -name "*.$FORMAT" -exec cp "{}" "corpus_$FORMAT" \;
done
rm -fr json_test_data-$TEST_DATA_VERSION
The generated corpus can be used with both libFuzzer and afl++. The remainder of this documentation assumes the corpus
directories have been created in the tests directory.
libFuzzer
To use libFuzzer, you need to pass -fsanitize=fuzzer as FUZZER_ENGINE. In the tests directory, call
make fuzzers FUZZER_ENGINE="-fsanitize=fuzzer"
This creates a fuzz tester binary for each parser that supports these command line options.
In case your default compiler is not a Clang compiler that includes libFuzzer (Clang 6.0 or later), you need to set the
CXX variable accordingly. Note the compiler provided by Xcode (AppleClang) does not contain libFuzzer. Please install
Clang via Homebrew calling brew install llvm and add CXX=$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang to the make call:
make fuzzers FUZZER_ENGINE="-fsanitize=fuzzer" CXX=$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang
Then pass the corpus directory as command-line argument (assuming it is located in tests):
./parse_cbor_fuzzer corpus_cbor
The fuzzer should be able to run indefinitely without crashing. In case of a crash, the tested input is dumped into
a file starting with crash-.
afl++
To use afl++, you need to pass -fsanitize=fuzzer as FUZZER_ENGINE. It will be replaced by a libAFLDriver.a to
re-use the same code written for libFuzzer with afl++. Furthermore, set afl-clang-fast++ as compiler.
CXX=afl-clang-fast++ make fuzzers FUZZER_ENGINE="-fsanitize=fuzzer"
Then the fuzzer is called like this in the tests directory:
afl-fuzz -i corpus_cbor -o out -- ./parse_cbor_fuzzer
The fuzzer should be able to run indefinitely without crashing. In case of a crash, the tested input is written to the
directory out.
OSS-Fuzz
The library is further fuzz-tested 24/7 by Google's OSS-Fuzz project. It uses
the same fuzzers target as above and also relies on the FUZZER_ENGINE variable. See the used
build script for more information.
In case the build at OSS-Fuzz fails, an issue will be created automatically.
Handling OSS-Fuzz reports
OSS-Fuzz files the crashes it finds in its own issue tracker, not on GitHub. So that each report can be traced to the change that fixed it, and each fix to the report it answers, fixes follow these conventions:
- Reference the OSS-Fuzz issue in the pull request, next to any GitHub issue it closes, as
OSS-Fuzz: <id>(for example,OSS-Fuzz: 563659413), and in the commit message. The ID alone does not disclose the crash. If the report was triaged into a GitHub issue, link the OSS-Fuzz issue there too. - Turn the reproducer into a unit test. Download the testcase from the OSS-Fuzz report, reduce it if possible, and
add it as a regression test to the unit test of the affected format (e.g.,
tests/src/unit-bjdata.cpp), with a comment naming the OSS-Fuzz issue. This way the input is checked by every CI run rather than only by OSS-Fuzz, and it stays covered even if OSS-Fuzz later closes the report as not reproducible. - Keep the fuzzer drivers and the unit tests in sync. The round-trip checks of the BJData, BON8, BSON, CBOR,
MessagePack and UBJSON drivers are also run on a fixed corpus in the unit tests (see
tests/src/round_trip_corpus.hppand the "round-trip invariants" test cases), so a regression shows up in CI first. When a driver's checks change, change the unit tests with them. - Record in the report whether the bug shipped. OSS-Fuzz asks whether a crash was a short-lived regression or affects a released version; answer it when the fix is merged, as it decides whether the fix needs a release note or a security advisory (see the security policy).
After the fix is merged, OSS-Fuzz re-runs the reproducer on its next build and marks the report as verified and closed. If it does not, the fix is incomplete.