* docs: new design for the documentation site Apply the brand to the Material for MkDocs site: Inter and JetBrains Mono served by the site (upright and real italic), brand colours, blue header band with the syntax pattern, wordmark in the header, new home page (hero, cards, animated feature tour), 404 page, polish for tabs, search, footer, focus rings, tables and code blocks, and theme features (code copy, previous/next footer, TOC follow, search suggestions). Draw the number railroad diagram, the parser callback events and the iterator illustrations as inline SVGs that follow the light and dark scheme. The generator scripts are in docs/mkdocs/scripts/figures; the feature slideshow (json-light.svg, json-dark.svg, replacing json.gif on the home page) is built by docs/mkdocs/scripts/slideshow. Decision nodes in five flowcharts become hexagons, which need far less room. Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> * docs: add figures, table captions and a macro chooser - Figures with numbered captions: SAX stepper, json_view layout and edit stepper, exception map, JSON pointer and patch walkers, QA pipeline, scaling and binary size charts, roadmap lanes, release timeline, integration decision tree and namespace builder - Table captions (nj-table-caption) on 9 pages - Compile times: modules and PCH charts, filesystem section, re-measured Figure 1, links between features/modules.md and compile_times.md - Interactive macro chooser for features/arbitrary_types.md - Link check: exclude URLs that answer the plugin with 400/401/419 or are dead (customers.md) Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> * docs: macro chooser generates adl_serializer for non-default-constructible types Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> * docs: cross-link concept pages and API pages in See also sections Add See also links in both directions between the concept pages (features, home, integration) and the API pages, write API links in code font, give every entry a comment after a dash, and show the callback event figure on the parser callbacks page. Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> * docs: address review comments on the new design - Home: add a "Latest release" button - Sponsors: update the list and group it by tier - Features: list all feature pages on the index page - Releases: add highlights per release, link the 4.0 roadmap, add the first commit to the timeline - Exceptions: prefix all example messages with the exception name - API: no code font for format names in the See also links of the to_/from_ pages - Merge Patch: show the document before, the patch, and the result - Replace "--" with typographic dashes, mark external links with an icon, center Mermaid diagrams Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me> --------- Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
6.4 KiB
Assurance case
This page argues why the library meets its security requirements. It describes the threats the library faces, where the trust boundaries lie, and how the library's design and the quality assurance counter these threats. To report a vulnerability, see the security policy.
Threat model
The library parses, stores, and serializes JSON values in memory. It does not open network connections, does not open
files (it only reads from streams or std::FILE* handles that the caller has already opened), does not read environment
variables, and does not implement cryptography or handle credentials.
The primary threat is therefore untrusted input: JSON text or binary data (BJData, BON8, BSON, CBOR, MessagePack, UBJSON)
that an attacker controls, passed to parse, accept,
sax_parse, or one of the from_* functions such as
from_cbor. Such input may try to
- make the library read or write out of bounds (malformed lengths, truncated input, invalid UTF-8),
- trigger undefined behavior (integer overflow in sizes or numbers, invalid casts),
- exhaust memory (huge announced sizes), or
- exhaust the call stack (deeply nested arrays and objects).
Trust boundaries
- Untrusted: all serialized input read by the parser, the SAX interface, and the binary readers. The library must
handle every possible input by either producing a value or throwing a
parse_error(or returningfalsewhen exceptions are disabled for the call). - Trusted: the C++ code that calls the library. Calling a function with violated preconditions, for instance
accessing an array with
operator[]out of range, is a programming error and not a security boundary. Such preconditions are checked with runtime assertions in debug builds; functions such asatoffer checked access with exceptions.
flowchart LR
A[Untrusted input] --> B[Parser]
A --> C[SAX interface]
A --> D[Binary readers]
B --> E["Value tree (basic_json)"]
C --> E
D --> E
E --> F[Trusted caller]
The trust boundary: untrusted input enters on the left through the parser, the SAX interface, or the binary readers, and only a value tree reaches the trusted caller on the right.
Secure design
- Strict parsing. The parser accepts exactly the JSON grammar of RFC 8259. Extensions such as comments and trailing commas must be enabled explicitly. Invalid UTF-8 is rejected.
- Errors are reported, not ignored. Malformed input results in a
parse_errorwith the byte position of the error. Binary readers do not trust announced sizes: strings and binary values grow only as bytes are actually read, arrays reserve at most a fixed number of elements up front, and sizes that no container can hold are rejected. - Memory is owned by values. Each
basic_jsonvalue owns its content, and there is no manual memory management in user code. The destructor does not recurse, so destroying a deeply nested value does not exhaust the stack. - Bounded recursion. The JSON parser and the binary readers keep their state in explicit stacks instead of
recursing per nesting level. Operations that walk a value, such as
dump, copying, comparison, hashing,merge_patch,diff,flatten, and the binary writers, recurse only up to a fixed depth and continue with an explicit stack below it. Applications that process untrusted input can limit its nesting depth with a parser callback. - Invariants are checked. The class invariant (for instance, that the pointer for the stored type is never null) is checked with runtime assertions throughout the test suite.
Common weaknesses
The following table maps the relevant classes of the Common Weakness Enumeration to the measures that counter them. The measures are described in detail in Quality assurance.
| Weakness | Countermeasures |
|---|---|
| Out-of-bounds read/write (CWE-125, CWE-787) | bounds checks on all reads from the input; AddressSanitizer and Valgrind on the test suite; OSS-Fuzz |
| Integer overflow (CWE-190) | UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer with integer overflow detection; Clang-Tidy; Cppcheck |
| Use after free, double free (CWE-416, CWE-415) | ownership of all memory by values; AddressSanitizer and Valgrind; Clang Static Analyzer |
| Memory leaks (CWE-401) | Valgrind (Memcheck) on the test suite |
| Uncontrolled recursion (CWE-674) | iterative parser, binary readers, and destructor; bounded recursion in value operations; tests with deeply nested inputs |
| Uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-400) | allocations based on announced sizes are capped; OSS-Fuzz with memory limits |
| Undefined behavior in general (CWE-758) | UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer; runtime assertions; Clang-Tidy, Cppcheck, Clang Static Analyzer, Infer |
In addition, every line of the library is covered by the unit tests, and all parsers are fuzz-tested around the clock by OSS-Fuzz.