Follow-up to @gregmarr's review: put_chars() was doing four unrelated jobs, so
give the two that can be made safe their own entry points.
- put_literal(): takes the literal by reference and deduces the length from the
array bound, so the 27 hand-counted lengths at the call sites can no longer
drift from the literals they describe. A literal is checked at compile time to
fit the buffer, so this path needs no write-through branch.
- put_buffer(): takes the fixed-size buffer itself rather than a bare pointer,
so the length can be checked against the buffer's own bound.
- put_indent(): memsets the indentation into the write buffer, filling and
flushing it as needed. This removes indent_string entirely, and with it both
bugs of #5186: the indentation string was grown by doubling, which is not
enough when indent_step more than doubles it (a heap over-read - dump(2000)
read 2000 bytes out of a 1024-byte string), and the grown part was filled with
a space instead of the configured indent_char. next_indent() keeps that PR's
assertion against the unsigned indentation accumulation wrapping on deep
nesting.
put_chars() keeps the two cases that are genuinely a pointer and a count: the
run-length copies out of the string being escaped, and to_chars() output.
Tests cover an indent_step wider than the write buffer, a non-space indentation
character past the old growth point, and nesting whose accumulated indentation
spans several buffer-fulls. All three fail against develop.
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
Niels Lohmann
d1fcc0532f