Files
json/include/nlohmann/detail
Niels LohmannandAfonso Januário a5f5d3059b Make std::hash<basic_json> consistent with operator== for numbers (#5772)
* Make std::hash<basic_json> consistent with operator== for numbers

operator== converts between number_integer, number_unsigned, and
number_float before comparing, so json(0), json(0U), and json(0.0)
all compare equal. hash() folded the specific value_t into the
result for each of the three numeric cases, giving each a distinct
hash and breaking the standard Hash requirement that a == b implies
hash(a) == hash(b). A std::unordered_set could therefore hold all
three as separate elements even though they compare equal.

hash() now treats all three numeric variants the same way: it
converts the value to number_float_t and combines it with a single
shared type tag, so any two numbers operator== considers equal hash
identically regardless of which internal type actually holds them.

Updated the accompanying test to check this consistency directly
(including via an actual unordered_set) instead of asserting that 0,
0U, and 0.0 hash differently, since that assumption was the bug.
Also corrected the function's own doc comment and the std::hash API
docs, which described the old behavior as intended.

Fixes #5400

Signed-off-by: Afonso Januário <afonso-januario@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* Remove now-unused number_integer_t/number_unsigned_t typedefs in hash()

Merging the three numeric branches into one that only reads
number_float_t left these two aliases unused, which several CI
configurations treat as a build error under -Wunused-local-typedefs.

Signed-off-by: Afonso Januário <afonso-januario@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* Mark the unordered_set in the hash regression test const

clang-tidy's misc-const-correctness check flagged it: the set is
never mutated after construction, only read via size().

Signed-off-by: Afonso Januário <afonso-januario@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* Normalize -0.0 in number hashes and test range ends

operator== compares numbers exactly since #5459, so equal numbers
share one value and convert to the same number_float_t. Update the
comment accordingly, map -0.0 to 0.0 before hashing (std::hash need
not do that), and test -0.0 and the ends of the integer ranges. Show
hash(0.0) in the docs example and note the change in the version
history.

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* Clarify hash documentation after review

- Say "may hash differently" for null, false, and numbers, since a
  collision across types is possible.
- Name the storage types (signed integer, unsigned integer,
  floating-point number) instead of example literals.
- Explain that the hash survives converting an integer to
  number_float_t but not the lossy conversion back, and that unequal
  numbers may share a hash.
- State that the example hash values are illustrative only and vary by
  platform, compiler, compiler version, and library version.

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

---------

Signed-off-by: Afonso Januário <afonso-januario@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
Co-authored-by: Afonso Januário <afonso-januario@hotmail.com>
2026-10-07 19:18:51 +02:00
..