write_number_with_ubjson_prefix() (unsigned and signed overloads) and
ubjson_prefix() (number_integer and number_unsigned cases) each picked
the UBJSON/BJData integer marker (i, U, I, u, l, m, L, M, H) with their
own independent if/else ladder, and the values beyond 64 bits were
handled by a second, tag-dispatched pair of ladders. An optimized
container announces the marker of its first element via ubjson_prefix()
and then writes every element through write_number_with_ubjson_prefix(),
so the two had to be kept in lockstep by hand across four call sites.
Replace all of that with one ubjson_integer_prefix() built on
value_in_range_of<T>, and one write_ubjson_integer_payload() that
writes the value (or, for 'H', the decimal digits) for a given marker.
write_number_with_ubjson_prefix() and ubjson_prefix() keep their
signatures and now just call these two helpers.
Behavior, the public API and the ABI are unchanged. Verified with a
new regression test covering scalars and $-optimized arrays/objects at
every int8/uint8/int16/uint16/int32/uint32/int64/uint64 boundary for
to_ubjson/to_bjdata (both use_size/use_type settings), and by diffing
to_ubjson/to_bjdata output before and after over the json_test_data
corpus (bit-identical).
Part of #5710
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
Niels Lohmann
0ffe9ab4a8