Suite, timeline endpoint, Appendix D and the scalar-run numbers now come from
develop b2674a4a2f with #5990-#5992, #5996-#6006 and #6008 merged. With #6008,
arrays of one element skip the scalar run, so nested arrays no longer pay for
it. The suite ran three rounds per version; the round of 3.12.0 and of 3.13.0
that differed from the other two was dropped, as the setup table says.
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
Suite, timeline endpoint, Appendix D and the scalar-run numbers now come from
develop b2674a4a2f with #5990, #5991, #5992, #5996, #5997, #5998, #5999 and
#6000 merged. The scalar runs are measured against a build without them on
develop's code, which no longer checks for a scalar before entering the loop.
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
The baseline is now develop 9c349b1d7c with every open non-draft pull
request merged, including #5968, #5970, #5971, #5975, #5976, #5978,
#5979, #5980, #5981 and #5982. The suite was rerun on 11-01 with every
step repeated when the load rose above 5 while it ran; the comparison
with other libraries and the held-out files were rerun on 10-31.
- suite: 3.0x geometric mean (median 2.9x); Appendix B, the overview
and the distribution regenerated
- timeline endpoint, Appendix D and the cliffs figure updated
- the held-out figure compares json_document with the fastest other
library
- new paragraphs for the pull requests listed above
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
The suite (Appendix B, the short-version table, the overview and distribution
figures) and the timeline endpoint now measure develop d20c4dcd89 with #5964
and #5908 merged. The geometric mean stays 2.9x (2.95); Dump/signed_ints and
Dump/unsigned_ints gain 1.5x and 2.1x from #5964; GetVectorDouble/floats drops
from 10.3x to 7.0x because the old candidate's suite binary happened to compile
that loop faster (a standalone build takes 0.97 ms with both headers).
The timeline endpoint is the 10-27 value scaled by the ratio of the new to the
old candidate, both measured on 10-30, so that it stays comparable with the
other points of the timeline.
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
A post for the documentation (Home > Blog) on how 3.13.0 became faster:
eight themes with the pull requests behind them, the ideas taken from other
libraries, what did not work, how the fast paths are tested, and the
compile-time cost. Every number comes from a run on 2026-10-27 (3.12.0 against
develop plus the open non-draft PRs, Apple M1 Max) or from the linked PR.
- docs/mkdocs/docs/home/blog/how_3_13_0_got_faster.md: the post.
- docs/mkdocs/scripts/figures/perf_blog.py: draws its 12 figures (overview,
eight timeline panels, the SWAR test, the cliffs, json_view throughput) as
inline SVGs in the nj-charts style; data/perf_timeline.csv holds the
timeline.
- tests/benchmarks/history: history.cpp and history.py time one fixed program
against the header of every commit that changed it, interleaved, and write
one CSV row per commit with its PR. The timeline of the post comes from it.
Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
Niels Lohmann