Overwork project infrastructure (#5218)

* 📝 overwork project infrastructure

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* 🐛 fix GCC16 issue

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* 🐛 fix GCC16 issue

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* 🐛 only build module for GCC

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* 🐛 fix build

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* 📝 fix documentation

Closes #5012: fix the error_handler_t::ignore wording

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

* 📝 fix documentation

Closes #4354: fix "Custom data source" example

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>

---------

Signed-off-by: Niels Lohmann <mail@nlohmann.me>
This commit is contained in:
Niels Lohmann
2026-06-30 18:09:06 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent adf78d3a76
commit 272411c5e6
28 changed files with 290 additions and 125 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
This library does not support comments *by default*. It does so for three reasons:
1. Comments are not part of the [JSON specification](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8259). You may argue that `//` or `/* */` are allowed in JavaScript, but JSON is not JavaScript.
2. This was not an oversight: Douglas Crockford [wrote on this](https://plus.google.com/118095276221607585885/posts/RK8qyGVaGSr) in May 2012:
2. This was not an oversight: Douglas Crockford [wrote on this](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3912149) in May 2012:
> I removed comments from JSON because I saw people were using them to hold parsing directives, a practice which would have destroyed interoperability. I know that the lack of comments makes some people sad, but it shouldn't.